Section sponsor:
|
The world’s top 100 pharma companies |
|||
| Ranking (last year's in brackets; NR = not ranked) | Company | 2010 pharma sales ($million) | Growth in Pharma sales 2010 over 2009 (%) |
| 1 (1) | Pfizer | 58523.00 | 28.77 |
| 2 (2) | Sanofi-Aventis (now Sanofi) | 40310.45 | -1.37 |
| 3 (7) | Merck & Co | 39811.00 | 57.75 |
| 4 (4) | Novartis | 39076.00 | 8.45 |
| 5 (3) | GlaxoSmithKline | 36132.20 | -2.62 |
| 6 (5) | Roche | 35568.27 | -1.25 |
| 7 (6) | AstraZeneca | 33269.00 | 1.42 |
| 8 (8) | Johnson & Johnson | 22396.00 | -0.55 |
| 9 (9) | Lilly | 21050.80 | 5.44 |
| 10 (11) | Abbott Laboratories | 19894.00 | 20.67 |
| 11 (12) | Bristol-Myers Squibb | 19484.00 | 3.59 |
| 12 (16) | Teva | 16121.00 | 15.99 |
| 13 (15) | Amgen | 14660.00 | 2.15 |
| 14 (14) | Bayer | 14471.64 | -0.86 |
| 15 (13) | Takeda | 14448.77 | 2.48 |
| 16 (10) | Boehringer Ingelheim | 12871.64 | -8.24 |
| 17 (17) | Astellas | 10875.01 | 4.25 |
| 18 (19) | Novo Nordisk | 10824.21 | 13.15 |
| 19 (18) | Daiichi Sankyo | 10517.24 | 3.60 |
| 20 (20) | Eisai | 8322.70 | 2.02 |
| 21 (22) | Otsuka Holdings | 8223.98 | 7.36 |
| 22 (21) | Baxter International | 8056.00 | 3.73 |
| 23 (23) | Merck KGaA | 7799.27 | 2.45 |
| 24 (24) | Gilead Sciences | 7389.92 | 14.23 |
| 25 (26) | Mylan | 5404.27 | 7.75 |
| 26 (25) | Servier | 4908.79 | -2.23 |
| 27 (28) | Mitsubishi Tanabe | 4668.76 | 10.27 |
| 28 (29) | Forest Laboratories | 4213.13 | 7.93 |
| 29 (27) | Nycomed | 4098.16 | -5.49 |
| 30 (33) | CSL | 4092.23 | 11.72 |
| 31 (32) | Allergan | 3973.40 | 7.86 |
| 32 (42) | Dainippon Sumitomo | 3814.28 | 50.57 |
| 33 (31) | UCB | 3696.19 | -1.22 |
| 34 (NR) | Menarini | 3613.00 | 4.06 |
| 35 (41) | Celgene | 3508.44 | 36.66 |
| 36 (34) | Biogen Idec | 3470.06 | 10.06 |
| 37 (35) | Genzyme | 3401.67 | 0.54 |
| 38 (36) | Shionogi | 3218.79 | 8.01 |
| 39 (38) | Shire | 3128.20 | 16.13 |
| 40 (39) | Alcon | 3066.00 | 14.53 |
| 41 (57) | Warner Chilcott | 2803.62 | 102.49 |
| 42 (45) | Cephalon | 2760.95 | 28.32 |
| 43 (47) | Watson Pharmaceuticals | 2585.20 | 27.01 |
| 44 (43) | Lundbeck | 2583.70 | 2.42 |
| 45 (46) | Kyowa Hakko Kirin | 2398.14 | 41.61 |
| 46 (37) | Hospira | 2349.50 | 13.32 |
| 47 (NR) | Actavis | 2242.52 | 6.80 |
| 48 (44) | STADA | 2158.51 | -1.34 |
| 49 (78) | Covidien | 1991.00 | -5.01 |
| 50 (50) | Actelion | 1752.91 | 11.77 |
| 51 (52) | Endo Pharmaceuticals | 1601.19 | 10.31 |
| 52 (59) | Galderma | 1596.68 | 17.06 |
| 53 (55) | Teijin | 1555.48 | 10.37 |
| 54 (48) | Meda | 1550.54 | -8.37 |
| 55 (51) | Ono Pharmaceutical | 1541.91 | 5.97 |
| 56 (56) | Hisamitsu | 1518.90 | 12.30 |
| 57 (58) | Meiji Holdings | 1488.06 | 8.97 |
| 58 (53) | Ipsen | 1459.59 | 1.33 |
| 59 (65) | Chiesi | 1346.60 | 10.70 |
| 60 (69) | Cipla | 1337.46 | 20.73 |
| 61 (66) | Asahi Kasei Pharma | 1326.81 | 9.53 |
| 62 (61) | Ferring | 1326.70 | 0.14 |
| 63 (60) | Gedeon Richter | 1321.50 | -1.14 |
| 64 (68) | Leo Pharma | 1290.36 | 13.29 |
| 65 (62) | Esteve | 1268.33 | -3.66 |
| 66 (74) | Lupin | 1251.79 | 26.14 |
| 67 (107) | Aspen Holdings | 1223.87 | 38.28 |
| 68 (64) | Gruenenthal | 1207.30 | -1.74 |
| 69 (71) | Santen | 1183.91 | 6.59 |
| 70 (81) | Elan | 1171.00 | 5.04 |
| 71 (63) | Almirall | 1170.68 | -9.30 |
| 72 (54) | Dr Reddy's | 1170.25 | 14.35 |
| 73 (75) | Kyorin Holdings | 1154.49 | 11.90 |
| 74 (82) | Sun Pharmaceutical Industries | 1150.67 | 62.28 |
| 75 (88) | Valeant Pharmaceuticals | 1133.37 | 43.64 |
| 76 (70) | KRKA | 1101.60 | -0.51 |
| 77 (40) | Taisho Pharmaceutical | 1062.16 | 10.77 |
| 78 (72) | Orion Pharma | 1025.67 | 4.16 |
| 79 (86) | Cadila | 985.60 | 31.93 |
| 80 (77) | Kaken Pharmaceutical | 985.28 | 8.30 |
| 81 (67) | Par Pharmaceutical Companies | 980.63 | -16.64 |
| 82 (79) | Ajinomoto | 942.15 | 6.61 |
| 83 (73) | Recordati | 931.70 | -7.30 |
| 84 (80) | Sigma-Tau | 892.87 | 4.12 |
| 85 (83) | Mochida | 862.32 | 7.42 |
| 86 (76) | Wockhardt | 817.77 | -12.11 |
| 87 (NR) | Pierre Fabre | 782.75 | N/A |
| 88 (93) | Dong-A | 762.14 | 20.43 |
| 89 (49) | King Pharmaceuticals | 752.71 | -32.37 |
| 90 (90) | Merz | 731.87 | 13.56 |
| 91 (100) | Sawai Pharmaceutical | 727.92 | 35.87 |
| 92 (NR) | Green Cross | 711.91 | 40.10 |
| 93 (95) | Medicis Pharmaceutical | 691.60 | 23.11 |
| 94 (85) | Amylin Pharmaceuticals | 651.11 | -13.64 |
| 95 (94) | Kissei | 631.04 | 9.81 |
| 96 (130) | Impax Laboratories | 624.96 | 113.60 |
| 97 (99) | Cubist Pharmaceuticals | 624.92 | 16.21 |
| 98 (102) | Glenmark Pharmaceuticals | 623.38 | 20.68 |
| 99 (92) | Zambon | 615.59 | -4.87 |
| 100 (96) | Maruho | 609.97 | 11.24 |

|
| Jim Botkin, Senior Vice-President of Operations |
Q. This year has been very eventful for
your company; can you tell Scrip 100 a
little about what has happened and how
this has affected the company’s offering?
In September 2011, the development
and manufacturing business Elan Drug
Technologies merged with Alkermes
to form a global biopharmaceutical
company under the name Alkermes plc.
Employing over 1,200 staff, Alkermes is a
fully integrated, global biopharmaceutical
company that develops innovative
medicines, with a diversified portfolio
of more than 20 commercial products. One aspect of this is the
longstanding capabilities for proprietary technologies and manufacturing
expertise that Alkermes applies to produce its own proprietary
medications, as well as drug products for partners.
My role is to leverage Alkermes’ product development and
manufacturing know-how and resources to expand the ways we offer
contract pharma services. We now have a broadened range of services
from product development and optimisation, to full-scale commercial
manufacturing from our US and Ireland facilities.
On the day of the merger, we also announced the signing of a multiyear, multimillion dollar manufacturing agreement with one of the world’s top 10
pharmaceutical companies. This agreement is expected to generate $15
million to $20 million in annual manufacturing revenues by 2016.
Q. Is this substantial deal a one-off, or is there a trend for outsourcing by big pharma that is gathering momentum?
I certainly believe that pharmaceutical contract manufacturing is emerging as a strategic option for many pharmaceutical companies and indeed
in a report published earlier this year by Global Industry Analysts, it was
forecast that the global pharmaceutical contract manufacturing market
alone would reach US $40.7 billion by 2015.
The problems relating to pharma productivity trends have been well
described at this stage and have in part fuelled pharma companies’
need to cut costs. One way to cut these costs is to outsource what is
considered “non-core” – for many this is manufacturing and product/
process optimisation.
Q. Pharma companies always sought outsourcing solutions – what is
so different now?
While it is true that pharma companies have routinely outsourced, in
the past outsourcing was often undertaken on a project by project
basis to manage gaps in pharma companies’ capacity, with contracts
and relationships predominately tactical. However, as manufacturing
processes become more complicated and regulatory requirements more
complex, pharma companies are finding that developing longer term
strategic arrangements are necessary.
Large pharma is becoming increasingly open to outsourcing more of
its drug development and manufacturing work to Contract (Development
and) Manufacturing Organisations (C(D)MOs) in order to improve
efficiencies, cut costs and scale to production demands. As a result,
pharma companies engage with fewer partners, but these providers
need to deliver a full service offering to compete for business. The
model whereby local pharma entities source CMOs to manage their
capacity peaks is not sustainable and has, according to a number of
commentators, caused many of the GMP compliance issues that have
impacted directly on pharma sponsor’s business.
For a pharma company to achieve the greatest benefits, it must
reinvent the relationship through persistent discussions with its preferred
partners on key areas such as planning, common objectives and the
responsibility of operating more effectively against key metrics.
At the recent CPhI World 2011 pre-show conference in Frankfurt,
we participated in a session dedicated to strategic outsourcing, where
big pharma highlighted the need for CMOs to step up and provide a full
service offering that will fulfil their strategic needs. Once a pharmaceutical
company can view its CMO(s) as an extension of its own organisation,
it can include them in strategic decision-making processes and facilitate
data transparency as partners.
Q. There is a trend by pharma companies to engage in contract
manufacturing with suppliers based in Asia– has this trend affected your
ability to win business?
It is true to say that pricing pressures have driven manufacturing
contractors to establish operations in emerging markets such as India,
China, Singapore, South Korea and more recently Malaysia. While
there are many companies willing to consider outsourcing in Asia,
many continue to remain closer to the more established territories of North America and Europe. Western-based facilities will remain competitive with an edge on quality, reliability, proximity and familiarity
with proximal markets.
Andrew Witty, CEO of GSK, announced earlier this year that he was
moving the manufacturing of a number of products back to Scotland from
India. Mr Witty contended that high labour-cost countries can compete
with low labour-cost countries if the provider works to a ‘lean’ agenda
with minimal overheads, has a relentless focus on continuous operational
and process improvements and is a (nearly) fully loaded production site.
Q. Andrew Witty says having a ‘lean’ agenda will allow western-based
suppliers to compete, is this something that Alkermes is planning to
pursue?
For the past five years or so, particularly in our facility in Athlone, Ireland, we have been pushing this lean agenda through our
Operational Excellence (OE) programmes. We have found that the
ability to demonstrate OE has been a key differentiator when pitching
for business. In general, pharmaceutical companies and contract
manufacturers have been historically slow to adopt the well established
OE tools such as 5S and lean manufacture.
Many lean implementations have failed in companies for various
reasons and/or have not been sustainable. According to an article in
the Supply Chain Management Review, common problems across
all industries, not just pharma, have been; the lack of leadership
commitment, excessive cost reduction focus, improper project selection
and suboptimal execution. However, OE and lean initiatives are arguably
the foundation on which practically all other improvement tools and
waste elimination initiatives rest.
The adoption of an OE culture throughout our organisation and the
implementation of industry-recognised measurement metrics such as
OTIF (On Time In Full) and RFT (Right First Time) have had a profound
positive impact, I believe, on contracts won and also maintained by
us. To me, it is surprising how many contract service providers have
not yet implemented OE in their plants. For western-based service
providers, where labour costs are, as a rule higher than Asian based
operations, implementing such initiatives are imperative in order to
compete on the finished cost and excel in areas such as quality, lead
times and security of supply.
Q. Besides operational excellence, what else do you consider critical to winning and maintaining business?
Without a doubt, it has to be quality. Building efficiencies is worthless
if the product you produce is of dubious quality. Again and again,
pharma companies are looking foremost for quality and on-time delivery
of product from their CMO partners. Look at Johnson & Johnson for
example – 11 major FDA recalls with $900 million lost sales in 2010 from
its McNeil division alone, all due to quality issues at its own or contracted
plants. To be a supplier of choice, having a good quality record is a given.
We have been audited by the FDA in our US and European plants since
we first began supplying finished goods to the US market in the 1980s.
Since 2007, we have had 11 agency-based inspections from the FDA,
EU regulatory authorities and others. There certainly is more industrywide
interest in seeking the FDA to increase inspections both in the US
and elsewhere, prompted in part by the high profile plant issues at J&J,
Genzyme and others. Such audits are to be welcomed as a reassurance
that processes and procedures are to the highest exacting standards.
Many observers are also concerned that inspections in high-risk regions
like China and India are almost non-existent when compared with the US
and Europe and that this lack of inspections poses a risk to public health.
In addition to offering optimum quality, one of the most valuable skills
I believe we have, as a service provider, is flexibility. Companies seeking
a competitive edge for their pharmaceuticals require an ever-growing
level of customisation from their contractors. We seek to provide this
customised, customer-driven approach to ensure we maintain and win
long-term strategic contracts with our partners.
Q. You mentioned at the start of this interview, that you would offer
expanded services as Alkermes – what services in particular?
As well as manufacturing services, we offer full formulation and analytical
expertise covering a range of molecule types. With our expanded
footprint in the US and Europe, we plan to offer broader knowledge
and experience in product development, process optimisation, tech
transfer and manufacturing. Our expanded workforce, with a wealth of
experience in development and manufacturing, can only increase our
attractiveness as an outsourcing partner of choice. With ever-increasing
sophisticated products entering the market, it is important to offer a
wider range of value-added services.
Being specialists in solid oral development, scale-up and manufacture
of small molecules with facilities in both the US and Europe, we pride
ourselves, through our expertise honed from our heritage in drug
delivery, in providing a range of services from process development right
through to commercial scale manufacture. Certainly for us, being able
to offer this range of services has become more and more important for
our partners. We have found that as companies are merging, closing
plants and outsourcing non-core activities, they expect more functions
to be managed externally – such as project management, regulatory
expertise and product and process optimisation. Being able to offer a
range and depth of services with expert scientific staff has, I believe,
gone a long way towards winning contracts such as our previously
mentioned manufacturing agreement announced in September.
Jim Botkin has recently assumed the role as head of operations responsible for contract pharma services at Alkermes.